What is Pascal’s wager summary?

Pascal’s wager is a philosophical argument presented by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, theologian, mathematician, and physicist, Blaise Pascal (1623–1662). It posits that human beings wager with their lives that God either exists or does not.

Is Pascal’s wager a good bet?

In conclusion, Pascal’s wager is not a good bet.

It is more advantageous to be a non-believer than to be a believer. Of course, you may use your reason and come to a different conclusion.

Why Pascals Wager is wrong?

Pascal’s logic is also flawed because belief in God does not always guarantee infinite joys and grace. According to the bible, the believers must strictly follow His words to enter heaven. That is, developing a fragile faith and not practicing the words of God could also lead to punishments after death.

What is the conclusion of the Pascal’s wager argument?

Wager against God

Pascal draws the conclusion at this point that you should wager for God. Without any assumption about your probability assignment to God’s existence, the argument is invalid. Rationality does not require you to wager for God if you assign probability 0 to God existing, as a strict atheist might.

What did Pascal say about religion?

In his Pensées (1657–58), Pascal applied elements of game theory to show that belief in the Christian religion is rational. He argued that people can choose to believe in God or can choose to not believe in God, and that God either exists or he does not.

Adblock
detector