## How is Zeno’s paradox resolved?

Figuring out the relationship between distance and time quantitatively did not happen until the time of Galileo and Newton, at which point Zeno’s famous paradox was resolved not by mathematics or logic or philosophy, but **by a physical understanding of the Universe**.

## What are the paradoxes of Zeno?

In the fifth century B.C.E., Zeno offered arguments that led to conclusions contradicting what we all know from our physical experience—**that runners run, that arrows fly, and that there are many different things in the world**. The arguments were paradoxes for the ancient Greek philosophers.

## What is the role of Zeno’s paradoxes?

Thus Plato has Zeno say the purpose of the paradoxes “is **to show that their hypothesis that existences are many, if properly followed up, leads to still more absurd results than the hypothesis that they are one**.” Plato has Socrates claim that Zeno and Parmenides were essentially arguing exactly the same point.

## How many paradoxes does Zeno have?

Zeno’s paradoxes are a set of **four** paradoxes dealing with counterintuitive aspects of continuous space and time. can converge, so that the infinite number of “half-steps” needed is balanced by the increasingly short amount of time needed to traverse the distances.

## How do you resolve a paradox?

To solve the paradox we need to think at a meta-level: **Solving the paradox is showing why the proposed method is conceptually wrong, or why the proposed method cannot work to solve the problem, or how the paradox formulation misrepresents reality or logic**.

## What is Zeno’s paradox Would the tortoise have won?

Zeno’s argument rests on the presumption that Achilles must first reach the point where the tortoise started, by which time the tortoise will have moved ahead, even if but a small distance, to another point; by the time Achilles traverses the distance to this latter point, the tortoise will have moved ahead to another, …

## What is the flaw in Zeno’s paradox?

Quote:

*So Zeno's paradox is this argument which obviously has to have a flaw and the puzzle is to find that flaw. We know that the faster runner will catch up with the slower runner. But Zeno has created a*

## What was Zeno trying to prove?

This first argument, given in Zeno’s words according to Simplicius, attempts to show that **there could not be more than one thing, on pain of contradiction**: if there are many things, then they are both ‘limited’ and ‘unlimited’, a contradiction.