From a deontological point of view, Robin Hood’s actions are unethical as they go against the laws set up by society.

Is Robin Hood ethical?

By this definition, Robin Hood is a virtuous person. He is courageous and definitely compassionate and generous. Therefore a Virtue Ethicist could argue Robin Hood’s actions are ethical, because Robin Hood possesses the traits of a virtuous person, and therefore the immoral act of theft is excused.

What is the moral lesson of Robin Hood?

LESSON #1: LIVE A BRAVE AND HONEST LIFE AND YOU WILL EARN RESPECT— Robin Longstride has a scene in the movie where he shows the moxie and bravery of telling King Richard the Lionheart, to his face, that his people will not respect him for his Crusades, no matter what success they supposedly brought.

What was Robin Hood’s philosophy?

A more formal term for the Robin Hood principle is “cosmopolitan prioritarianism“, an ethical rule that says we should think of everyone in the world in the same way, no matter where they live, and then focus help where it helps the most. Those who have less have priority over those who have more.

Is Robin Hood an example of utilitarianism?

Robin Hood’s basic ethical principle, to steal from the rich and give to the poor, appears to be the utilitarian approach. This is because he is doing an action that may not be intrinsically a ‘right’ action.

Which ethical framework justifies the case of Robin Hood?

Robin Hood was a utilitarian. So, his ideas would never match with Kant, who was totally against utilitarianism. Robin Hood’ basic ethical principle stated: “to steal from the rich and give to the poor.” Although the act of stealing is immoral, helping the poor with that money is a moral act.

Is Robin Hood justified?

ABSTRACT: The legend of Robin Hood exemplifies a distinct concern of justice neglected by theorists: the distributive results of systemic injustices. Robin Hood’s redistributive activities are justified by the principle that the distributive results of systemic injustices are unjust and should be corrected.

Why Robin Hood is not a hero?

The real Robin Hood, and indeed Hoods may not be deserving of the true hero status, he is no chivalric perfect being, and nor is he a saint of the greenwood. His somewhat cowardly nature and lacklustre fighting ability speak volumes.

Is stealing morally acceptable in some situations?

It is a dilemma because there is a conflict between the choices. Usually one action, though morally right, violates another ethical standard. A classic example is stealing to feed your family. Stealing is legally and ethically wrong, but if your family is starving it might be morally justified.

What is wrong with utilitarianism?

Perhaps the greatest difficulty with utilitarianism is that it fails to take into account considerations of justice. We can imagine instances where a certain course of action would produce great benefits for society, but they would be clearly unjust.

Was Robin Hood actually a good person?

Robin Hood was a philanthropist who robbed the rich to give to the poor. It was the Scottish historian John Major who in 1521 wrote that “[Robin] permitted no harm to women, nor seized the goods of the poor, but helped them generously with what he took from abbots”.

Is Robin Hood an anti villain?

Robin Hood is a classical literary anti-hero, stealing from the rich (which is bad) to give to the poor (which is good). His undoubtedly criminal (not to mention politically motivated) acts force us to admit he should be locked up.

Was Robin Hood a villain or a hero?

Robin Hood, legendary outlaw hero of a series of English ballads, some of which date from at least as early as the 14th century.

Was Robin Hood a real hero give reason for your answer?

Answer. Answer: Robin Hood is a legendary heroic outlaw originally depicted in English folklore and subsequently featured in literature and film. According to legend, he was a highly skilled archer and swordsman.

Did Robin Hood steal from the rich?

In the original stories, Robin and his men even killed people travelling through the forest. And we are sorry to break your heart, but he did not steal from the rich and give to the poor either. He definitely stole, but most of it went into his own pocket!

Why Robin Hood was a crook?

He was labeled this because he was betraying his country by stealing from the prince, Prince John, and fighting the sheriff of Nottingham. These were two people in positions of power and authority, and Robin Hood defied them and fought against them.

Did Robin Hood give to the poor?

The Robin Hood effect gets its name from the English folkloric outlaw Robin Hood, who, according to legend, stole from the rich to give to the poor. A reverse Robin Hood effect occurs when the better-off gain at the expense of the less well-off.

Adblock
detector