Should science be free from values?

According to a venerable way of thinking about science and its place in our lives, science is value-free. Science sets its sights on the facts. It is interested in the way the world is apart from inherently subjective matters of interpretation. Science can learn the facts without needing to take a stand on values.

Why do scientists need to research?

Without the ability to critically evaluate information, we endanger the health and well-being of our patients. Conducting research is an important component for the development of scientific thinking. Research adds to the body of knowledge and propels our medical specialty forward.

Should scientific research be restricted in any way?

Although negative side effects are present due to scientific progress and human lives are being threatened, scientific research has also came up with solutions for such harmful effects. Thus, scientific research should not be restricted so as to allow mankind to continue to benefit from it. …read more.

Why do scientists need to be ethical?

Adhering to the scientific ethic assures that data collected during research are reliable and that interpretations are reasonable and with merit, thus allowing the work of a scientist to become part of the growing body of scientific knowledge.

What is free science?

Free the Science is a business-model changing initiative that will make our research freely available to all readers, while remaining free for authors to publish. It is a new publishing standard for ECS, one of the last independent, nonprofit scientific society publishers.

Should science have values?

Most scientists believe that one basic characteristic of science is that it deals with facts, not values. Science is objective, while values are not. Certain scientists see themselves as working in the privileged domain of certain knowledge.

Should science have ethical limits?

Thus science must be subject to ethical limits that are wider than the protection of human subjects. The interests of nonhuman animals are also entitled to equal consideration, and this requires a further set of ethical re- strictions on science. Again, exactly where the line should be drawn is not easy to specify.

What are the ethical issues in scientific research?

This research found ten ethical principles common across scientific disciplines. They are duty to society; beneficence; conflict of interest; informed consent; integrity; nondiscrimination; nonexploitation; privacy and confidentiality; professional competence; and professional discipline.

What are some ethical issues in science?

The ethical dilemmas and policy issues are:

  • Personalized genetic tests/personalized medicine. …
  • Hacking into medical devices. …
  • Driverless Zipcars. …
  • 3-D printing. …
  • Adaptation to climate change. …
  • Low-quality and counterfeit pharmaceuticals. …
  • Autonomous systems. …
  • Human-animal hybrids (chimeras)

Should scientists be held responsible for their discoveries?

Scientists must not only have a sense that they are morally culpable for the uses of their discoveries where they understand the risk—harm—likelihood calculus, but they must also be liable to be held culpable where harms result from their acts, and where they possess a culpable mens rea.

What values should a scientist have?

Those surveyed, using a scale from zero to ten, were asked to rate attentiveness, collaborative, courage, curiosity, honesty, humility to evidence, meticulousness, objectivity, perseverance and skepticism with regard to their importance for scientific research.

What are the moral responsibilities of scientists?

Scientists have a moral obligation first to be good citizens, second to be good scholars, and third to be good scientists.

What causes scientists to disagree?

These three classes of reasons offer plausibly distinct explanations: disputing scientists include one group that is more competent than the other, one or both groups’ scientific work is influenced by values or self-interest, or the topic is too complex and uncertain for scientists to (currently) converge on an answer.

What responsibilities do scientists have and why?

Scientists are responsible for conducting and communicating scientific work with integrity, respect, fairness, trustworthiness and transparency, and for considering the consequences of new knowledge and its application.