What is the difference between caring and wanting for Frankfurt?

Discussion: Wanting to do what is best for Elise is a first-order desire, but caring for Frankfurt is a second-order desire, something he often calls a volition. To have a volition is very different than having a first-order desire.

What is love according to Harry Frankfurt?

Frankfurt goes on to explain that the most important form of caring is love, a nonvoluntary, disinterested concern for the flourishing of what is loved. And he contends that the purest form of love is self-love.

How does Frankfurt See self-love morality?

Because who or what one loves is not grounded in any objective value or good, Frankfurt argues that genuine self-love is compatible with loving what is bad, what is evil. What makes self-love genuine in part for him is wholeheartedness.

What concept of love does Nozick offer?

Nozick (1989) offers a union view that differs from those of Scruton, Fisher, and Solomon in that Nozick thinks that what is necessary for love is merely the desire to form a “we,” together with the desire that your beloved reciprocates.

Why are there two frankfurts in Germany?

After World War II, the eastern part of Frankfurt became part of Poland under the terms of the Potsdam Agreement and was renamed to Słubice, while the western part became a border town of the German Democratic Republic in 1949.

Is Harry Frankfurt a Compatibilist?

The view that free will is compatible with determinism is called compatibilism. Harry Frankfurt is a prominent defender of a compatibilist view of free will.

What are the three principles of Nozick’s entitlement theory?

Entitlement theory of justice involves three ideas; justice in acquisition, justice in transfer, and rectification of injustice. Most political philosophers rejected Nozick’s entitlement perspective, for its shaky foundation and lack of practical relevance.

What is the meaning of life according to Robert Nozick?

Nozick’s proposal: “Attempts to find meaning in life seek to transcend the limits of an individual life. . . . For a life to have meaning, it must connect with other things, with some things or values beyond itself” (ibid.).

What did Nozick believe in?

With respect to political philosophy, Nozick was a right-libertarian, which in short means he accepted the idea that individuals own themselves and have a right to private property.

What is wrong with Nozick’s theory?

As an alternative to Rawls’ theory, Nozick suggests his entitlement theory. One of the main problem with Nozick’s arguments is the “abstractness of the individualism they presuppose” and individualism, according to Lukes, is a “distorting lens that satisfies the intellect while simplifying the world”.

What is the first principle of Nozick’s entitlement theory?

The first principle of Nozick’s entitlement theory concerns the original acquisition of holdings – that is, the appropriation of unheld goods or the creation of new goods.

Is Nozick a Kantian?

Nozick takes his position to follow from a basic moral principle associated with Immanuel Kant and enshrined in Kant’s second formulation of his famous Categorical Imperative: “Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.” The idea here is …

Is Nozick new right?

Nozick was a true libertarian who wholeheartedly advocated free market capitalism. At the core of Nozick’s philosophy is the concept of individual sovereignty. We thereby hold property over our person, and possession of bodily integrity is a natural right.

Is Nozick a utilitarian?

Utilitarianism. Nozick created the thought experiment of the “utility monster” to show that average utilitarianism could lead to a situation where the needs of the vast majority were sacrificed for one individual.

Is Nozick a Deontologist?

Robert Nozick (1938-2002), an American political philosopher, was a pioneer of a particular form of libertarianism, known as deontological libertarianism, which is built upon a foundation of strict moral rules and property rights.

Why is Nozick against redistribution?

Robert Nozick (1974, p 169) for example, has argued that redistribution in the form of compulsory taxation is “morally on par with forced labor.” And he has famously criticized egalitarian principles of distributive justice, such as Rawls’s difference principle (which categorizes as unjust any national economic order …

Does Nozick agree with Locke?

Nozick accepts a formulation of Locke’s proviso which holds that “a process normally giving rise to a permanent bequeathable property right in a previously unowned thing will not do so if the position of others no longer at liberty to use the thing is thereby worsened” (178).