Do determinists believe in punishment?

Although compatibilists believe that responsibility is possible even if determinism is true, hard determinists believe that we are determined and that blame and punishment cannot be reconciled with that fact.

Can punishment including capital punishment be justified on utilitarian grounds?

More specifically, a utilitarian approach sees punishment by death as justified only if that amount of punishment for murder best promotes the total happiness, pleasure, or well-being of the society.

Is capital punishment justified from ethical point of view?

Deterrence. Capital punishment is often justified with the argument that by executing convicted murderers, we will deter would-be murderers from killing people.

Are ethics and determinism compatible?

Since determinism implies that agents could not have done otherwise once initial conditions and the laws of nature are held fixed, it follows that free will and moral responsibility are incompatible with determinism.

What is the argument for hard determinism?

Hard determinists think that all human actions are causally determined by the laws of nature and initial conditions. At any moment, the state of your brain and your environment together with the principles that govern the behavior of matter necessitate the way that you will act.

What is the theory of determinism?

Determinism entails that, in a situation in which a person makes a certain decision or performs a certain action, it is impossible that he or she could have made any other decision or performed any other action. In other words, it is never true that people could have decided or acted otherwise than they actually did.

Can determinism and free will coexist?

Determinism is incompatible with free will and moral responsibility because determinism is incompatible with the ability to do otherwise.

Do determinists believe in moral responsibility?

Since moral responsibility seems to require free will, hard determinism implies that no one is morally responsible for his actions. Although the conclusion is strongly counterintuitive, some hard determinists have insisted that the weight of philosophical argument requires that it be accepted.

Does determinism undermine moral responsibility?

Since determinism implies that agents could not have done otherwise once initial conditions and the laws of nature are held fixed, it follows that free will and moral responsibility are incompatible with determinism.

Does determinism negate free will?

Much of the philosophical interest in the free will/determinism problem is motivated by concerns about moral responsibility because, it is generally agreed, having free will is a necessary condition of being morally responsible. So if determinism precludes free will, it also precludes moral responsibility.

Why is it impossible for those who accept determinism to deliberate about what they are going to do?

Why is it impossible for those who accept determinism to deliberate about what they are going to do? If determinism is true, you cannot deliberate. :: If things have causes and are determined, you have no input.

Is determinism the opposite of free will?

Free will is the ability to make something happen without the influence of the environment or heredity. The opposite of free will is hard determinism, the belief that all our choices are caused.

Is determinism proven?

Determinism in nature has been shown, scientifically, to be false. There is no real debate about this among physicists.

What is the problem with determinism?

Soft Determinism

However, a problem with determinism is that it is inconsistent with society’s ideas of responsibility and self control that form the basis of our moral and legal obligations.

Does quantum mechanics disprove determinism?

The equations of quantum mechanics do not determine what will happen, but determine strictly the probability of what will happen. In other words, they certify that the violation of determinism is strictly random. This goes in exactly the opposite direction from human freedom to choose.

Does the uncertainty principle disprove determinism?

Heisenberg directly challenged this determinism with the development of the uncertainty principle. In quantum physics it is impossible to measure the movement of a particle, at the same time as its position. Laplace, therefore, was wrong at the atomic/molecular level.

What does quantum mechanics say about determinism?

“In quantum mechanics,” she explains, “we can only predict probabilities for measurement outcomes, rather than the measurement outcomes themselves. The outcomes are not determined, so quantum mechanics is indeterministic. Superdeterminism returns us to determinism.”

Adblock
detector