What is the epistemic regress problem?
The epistemic regress problem is an epistemological problem. Epistemology is the study of knowledge and related notions: the study of how and even whether we can have evidence- providing reasons for belief. The regress problem poses a problem about how and even whether we can have evidential support for propositions.
Is an infinite regress possible?
The mere existence of an infinite regress by itself is not a proof for anything. So in addition to connecting the theory to a recursive principle paired with a triggering condition, the argument has to show in which way the resulting regress is vicious.
What is infinite regress argument?
An infinite regress argument is an argument that makes appeal to an infinite regress. Usually such arguments take the form of objections to a theory, with the fact that the theory implies an infinite regress being taken to be objectionable.
What is an infinite temporal regress?
“An infinite temporal regress of events is an actual infinite.” “Thus an infinite temporal regress of events cannot exist.” This argument depends on the (unproved) assertion that an actual infinite cannot exist; and that an infinite past implies an infinite succession of “events”, a word not clearly defined.
How does Coherentism solve the epistemic regress problem?
Coherentism excludes such foundations by affirming that all justified beliefs are justified in virtue of their relations to other beliefs. Thus, on the coherentist solution to the regress problem no evidence chains terminate in immediately justified, foundational beliefs. In a sense, all justification is inferential.
What is the regress argument for Foundationalism?
1. Regress Arguments for Foundationalism. A foundational or noninferentially justified belief is one that does not depend on any other beliefs for its justification. According to foundationalism, any justified belief must either be foundational or depend for its justification, ultimately, on foundational beliefs.
Is an infinite regress absurd?
As seen in the example given to us by Aristotle, regress arguments can be constructive; that is, they are used as justifications for belief. For Aristotle, infinite regression presents as something absurd.
Can there be an infinite past?
Each year is separated from any other by a finite number of years (remember that there’s no first year). There never was a time when the past became infinite because no set can become infinite by adding any finite number of members. So, if the past is infinite, then it has always been infinite.
Is infinite regress a logical fallacy?
It’s a fallacy because it is begging the question that is to say that it is a circular argument. Whether referring to the origins of the universe or any other regressive context, the answer simply moves the question back into infinite regress rather than answering it.
Is Infinity a contradiction?
It’s not that “infinity is the biggest integer” – such an idea is contradictory. It’s that “there is no such thing as the largest-possible integer.” Or, shorthand, “Positive integers are infinite in size.”
Is infinity a paradox?
The paradox arises from one of the most mind-bending concepts in math: infinity. Infinity feels like a number, yet it doesn’t behave like one. You can add or subtract any finite number to infinity and the result is still the same infinity you started with. But that doesn’t mean all infinities are created equal.
Why does infinity not exist?
In the context of a number system, in which “infinity” would mean something one can treat like a number. In this context, infinity does not exist.
Can infinity be limited?
Unlike indefiniteness, infinity doesn’t have a limit that is beyond what is actually calculable; rather, infinity is without limit.
Is infinity infinity defined?
infinity, the concept of something that is unlimited, endless, without bound. The common symbol for infinity, ∞, was invented by the English mathematician John Wallis in 1655.
Is infinity a real number?
Infinity is a “real” and useful concept. However, infinity is not a member of the mathematically defined set of “real numbers” and, therefore, it is not a number on the real number line.