No it’s different. The genetic fallacy is an attack on the source of some evidence. The ad hominem fallacy is an attack on the person making the argument. They are the same when the person making the argument is the source of the evidence.

What is ad hominem genetic fallacy?

This fallacy is committed when the arguer ignores the merits of his/her opponent’s argument, and rather makes some reference to the arguer himself/herself, and assumes that this somehow discredits the argument.

What type of fallacy is genetic fallacy?


The genetic fallacy (also known as the fallacy of origins or fallacy of virtue) is a fallacy of irrelevance that is based solely on someone’s or something’s history, origin, or source rather than its current meaning or context.

What are the types of genetic fallacy?

The fallacy can take two common forms that are of interest: an ad hominem (“against the man”) argument holds something to be false because of where it comes from; and an argument “from authority” (ab auctoritate) holds something to be true because of where it comes from.

What is an example of a genetic fallacy?

For example, dismissing an argument as invalid solely because the person behind it comes from a not-so-prestigious school would be a genetic fallacy.

What is the genetic fallacy quizlet?

What is the genetic fallacy? Arguing that a claim is true or false only because of its origins. Can the origin of a claim ever be relevant to deciding its truth or falsity? In most cases, the source of an idea is irrelevant to its truth.

What are some examples of ad hominem?

A basic example of an ad hominem argument is a person telling someone “you’re stupid, so I don’t care what you have to say”, in response to hearing them present a well-thought position.

What are the three types of ad hominem?

Let’s look at the different types of ad hominem arguments you might find.

  • Abusive – This is where the person is directly attacked. …
  • Circumstantial – Personal circumstances motivate a person’s argument, so it must be false. …
  • Guilt by Association – Due to an association to something negative, an argument is discredited.

What is the fallacy circumstantial ad hominem?

Circumstantial Ad Hominem. Fallacy occurs when someone uses unsound reasoning to support a claim or argument. Circumstantial Ad Hominem occurs when someone attacks a claim by saying that the person making the claim is only making it because it’s in his/her interest or because of his/her circumstances.

Is ad hominem a rhetorical device?

Ad hominem (add HOMM-inn-emm), also known as argumentum ad hominem, is a rhetorical device that involves commenting on or against the individual making an argument rather than on the argument itself.

What is another name for ad hominem fallacy?

Ad hominem means “against the man,” and this type of fallacy is sometimes called name calling or the personal attack fallacy. This type of fallacy occurs when someone attacks the person instead of attacking his or her argument. Person 1: I am for raising the minimum wage in our state.

Which statement is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?

The most common (but probably least recognized) ad hominem is the inconsistency ad hominem, where someone’s claim is being attacked based on that person being inconsistent. Examples: – “Pay no attention to her arguments against abortion. I happen to know that she had three abortions herself!”