What is metaethical relativism?

Metaethical Moral Relativism (MMR). The truth or falsity of moral judgments, or their justification, is not absolute or universal, but is relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of a group of persons.

What is Metaethical relativism quizlet?

Metaethical relativism is the claim that we ought to conform to the moral code of our culture. True. Metaethical relativism says that what makes lying wrong for you is the fact that God’s desires that we not lie or commands us not to lie.

What is a Metaethical statement?

A meta-ethical theory, unlike a normative ethical theory, does not contain any ethical evaluations. Instead, metaethical statements are statements about ethics as such, and not about problems of ethics as those problems are commonly experienced.

What is the difference between cultural relativism and moral relativism?

The fundamental difference between Cultural and Moral relativism is that moral is more individual to a particular person. It is more down to that persons true beliefs. Cultural relativism influences people’s own personal moral opinions and so it results in consistent moral beliefs throughout that particular culture.

What is the difference between ethical relativism and cultural relativism?

Cultural relativism is seen as different societies that believe in different moralities. Cultural relativists see their view as a sociological fact where scholarly works proves the existence of different moralities. On the contrary, ethical relativists claim that the same action that is moral is immoral in another.

What is the difference between ethical universalism and ethical relativism?

Ethical relativism asserts that moral truths vary from person to person or culture to culture. Ethical universalism asserts that moral truths do not vary in this fashion.

What is the difference between ethical absolutism and ethical relativism?

These are two of the popular philosophical debates under ethics, the study of morality. Absolutism holds that standards are always true. On the other hand, relativism considers the contexts of situations. Hence, absolutism endorses equality while relativism advocates equity.