Does Anselm’s ontological argument prove the existence of God?
Anselm claims to derive the existence of God from the concept of a being than which no greater can be conceived. St. Anselm reasoned that, if such a being fails to exist, then a greater being—namely, a being than which no greater can be conceived, and which exists—can be conceived.
What did Anselm’s ontological argument prove?
As an “a priori” argument, the Ontological Argument tries to “prove” the existence of God by establishing the necessity of God’s existence through an explanation of the concept of existence or necessary being . Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury first set forth the Ontological Argument in the eleventh century.
What is wrong with Anselm’s argument?
While some people are convinced that God exists once they have been exposed to Anselm’s Ontological Argument, many are not. The unconvinced sense that one cannot argue for God’s existence in this way and thus that the argument’s logic is flawed. Articulating the flaw is not easy, however.
Is Anselm’s argument true?
Anselm’s argument in Chapter 2 can be summarized as follows: It is a conceptual truth (or, so to speak, true by definition) that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined (that is, the greatest possible being that can be imagined). God exists as an idea in the mind.
What is Anselm’s concept of God?
Anselm began with the concept of God as that than which nothing greater can be conceived. To think of such a being as existing only in thought and not also in reality involves a contradiction, since a being that lacks real existence is not a being than which none greater can be conceived.
What does Anselm’s ontological argument mean?
When Saint Anselm of Canterbury authored the ontological argument, he defined God as an unmatched Supreme Being. He asserted that all humans share this concept of God. The ontological argument asserts God, being defined as most great or perfect, must exist since a God who exists is greater than a God who does not.
Is the ontological argument successful?
There is no real evidence to show God’s existence and some statements are poor (such as existence being predicate). Therefore the Ontological Argument is unsuccessful in proving God’s existence.
Is the ontological argument convincing?
The general overall argument is convincing because it is logical to think that God is the greatest thing that can be thought of and to agree with our statement, “that than which nothing greater can be conceived” he must exist in reality.
Which philosopher proved the existence of God?
His research focuses on metaphysics, ethics, and philosophy of biology. René Descartes‘ (1596-1650) “Proofs of God’s Existence” is a series of arguments that he posits in his 1641 treatise (formal philosophical observation) “Meditations on First Philosophy,” first appearing in “Meditation III.
Why is Anselm’s ontological argument weak?
The main weakness of Anselm’s argument is posed by Gaunilo of Marmoutier, a contemporary of Anselm, Gaunilo posed, using reductio ad absurdum, that if the logic of the argument were applied to anything other than God, its conclusion would be unreasonable.
What is the weakness of the ontological argument?
One weakness of the ontological argument is that its logic can let us say a lot of things exist by definition. You just have to imagine it in its most perfect form and then we can say logically that it exists by definition. This doesn’t happen so the argument is flawed and unreliable.
What is the ontological argument simple?
The ontological argument is an idea in religious philosophy. It is supposed to show that God exists. There are different versions, but they all argue something like: because we can imagine a perfect being, there must be a god. The idea is that existing makes a good thing better than one that’s only imaginary.